Office of Collective Bargaining > Labor Agreements > District 1199 > District 1199 Contract Table of Contents >
|
This
is a labor agreement with annotations by the Office of Collective
Bargaining.
PLEASE NOTE:Language that is in bold typeface and underlined was added with this Agreement. Language that is Language in Italics are annotations added by the Office of Collective Bargaining. |
A vacancy is defined as an opening in a full-time permanent or part-time permanent position in the bargaining unit which the agency has determined is necessary to fill and does not include those positions identified through mutual agreement between the union and the agency as being subject to reorganization, changes in appointment category (type), or a movement that constitutes a demotion.
When a vacancy is created by an incumbent employee leaving the position, and that incumbent is above the entry level position in the classification series, the job shall be posted at the level in the classification series of the leaving employee, provided the duties and responsibilities remain the same. After the employees have had the opportunity to bid for lateral transfers or for promotions, the position can be reduced in the classification series.
When a vacancy will be created by an incumbent employee leaving a position, the agency may post the vacancy and interview and provisionally select a candidate anytime after receiving notice that the position will be vacated.
A job vacancy shall be posted for a minimum of seven (7) days on designated bulletin boards within the agency at the facility where the vacancy exists. Applicants will be notified of the final determination within thirty (30) days after the selection for a position.
Applications for posted positions may be filed electronically by using the DAS On-Line Employment Application Process (OLEAP).
Any employee who desires to be considered for a position(s) in another agency(s) shall submit an Ohio Civil Service Application (ADM-4268) to the appointing authority of the agency or institution where employment is sought. Such application shall specify the desired classification(s) and work site(s). These applications will be maintained on file for one (1) year from the date of receipt by the appointing authority. If a posted vacancy is not filled pursuant to steps A and B as outlined in Section 30.02 of this Article, any applicant meeting qualifications for this position shall be considered pursuant to Section 30.02, step C of this Article.
The Employer shall prepare and make available a booklet detailing the classifications available in various agencies, including a listing of the appointing authorities to which applications are to be sent.
Notice of newly-created classifications shall be provided to the Union's central office thirty (30) days prior to initial posting.
The Employer is currently developing a process to
permit individuals to file an electronic application for a posted vacancy.
The Employer may implement this process in addition to the current process
during the term of this Agreement. The Union will be provided a reasonable
notice and an opportunity to comment prior to the implementation of such
a program. Application processes shall not be changed without mutual consent.
|
Explanation: |
The change in language updates the contract to reflect the transition from a potential on-line application process to actuality. |
|
Attention: |
Agency Labor Relations Officers and Personnel Officers. |
|
Effective Date: |
June 1, 2003 |
30.02 Awarding the Job (Transfers and Promotions and Demotions)
"Lateral transfer" is defined as employee requested movement to a posted vacancy which is in the same pay range as the classification the employee currently holds.
“Promotion” is the movement of an employee to a posted vacancy in a classification with a higher pay range. A higher pay range is defined as a pay range in which the first step or the last step has a higher pay rate than the first or last step of the pay range to which the employee is currently assigned.
“Demotion" is defined as the movement of an employee to a vacant position within a classification covered by the terms of this Agreement pursuant to the provisions set forth for the filling of a vacancy, to a lower pay range only within the employee’s current Agency. A lower pay range is defined as a pay range in which the first step has a lower rate of pay than the first step of the pay range to which the employee is currently assigned. Should the employee be selected for an inter-agency transfer to a position in a lower pay range than that currently held, the employee shall be placed in the step closest to but not to exceed the step currently held by the employee.
“Inter-Agency Transfer” is defined as an employee-requested movement to a posted vacancy in a different agency. Should the employee be selected for an inter-agency transfer to a position with a higher pay range than that currently held by the employee, the employee shall be placed in the step to guarantee an increase of approximately four percent (4%). Should the employee be selected for an inter-agency transfer to a position in the same pay range currently held by the employee, the employee shall be placed in the same step of the pay range. If the agency has a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding pay, it shall take precedence over this section.
|
Explanation: |
The definition of demotion is limited to movements within the same agency. New language defines “Inter-Agency Transfer” as any movement between agencies. As a result, the definition of promotions and laterals has now been restricted to movement within one agency. Promotions may be a subset of Inter-agency Transfers if the movement is between agencies. If a promotion occurs from one agency to another, it is considered an Inter-agency Transfer and is subject to the provisions governing Inter-agency Transfers. Article 9 provides that employees requesting an Inter-Agency Transfer shall serve an initial probationary period. The Employer may remove the employee if they fail to perform the job requirements of the position. The employee may grieve such removal. The standard for removal is not a just cause analysis. The Employer must merely show the employee is not able to perform the job requirements to the Employer’s satisfaction. Only employees who accept an inter-agency transfer to a higher pay range will be eligible to move to the next higher step at the end of the probationary period. Employees requesting Inter-Agency Transfers shall be permitted to transfer applicable leave balances to their new agencies (i.e. sick, vacation and personal leave). Compensatory time does not transfer upon an Inter-Agency Transfer. Other changes to this Section are housekeeping. |
|
Attention: |
Agency Supervisors; Agency Labor Relations and Personnel Officers. |
|
Effective Date: |
June 1, 2003 |
Employees in classifications not covered by the terms of this Agreement may not be demoted into a classification covered by the terms of this Agreement without the agreement of the Union. This does not include employees in the unclassified service in classifications not covered by the terms this Agreement who may be placed into a position covered by the terms of the Agreement where such unclassified status is revoked consistent with civil service law.
Applications will be considered filed timely if they
are received or postmarked no later than the closing date listed on the
posting. Applicants must clearly demonstrate on the application how
they possess the minimum qualifications for the position. Failure to do
so will result in the application being screened out and rendered ineligible
for further consideration. All timely filed eligible
applications shall be reviewed considering the following criteria: qualifications,
experience, education, and work record,. and affirmative
action. Employment diversity may be a factor in the selection.
The Employer maintains the right to administer a test or instrument to measure
the listed criteria. Among those that are qualified the job shall
be awarded to the applicant with the most state seniority unless a junior
employee is significantly more qualified based on the listed criteria.
The Union may challenge the validity of the test or instrument as
part of a non-selection grievance.
The Employer and the Union agree, through each Agency
Professional Committee to review and discuss the agency's approved affirmative
action EEO Strategic plan annually prior to submission
to EEO State EOD. Such plans shall include specific
hiring goals where necessary an employee diversity analysis.
|
Explanation: |
The change clarifies the employee’s responsibilities when applying for vacancies as well as the Employer’s right to administer a test to select the most qualified. Institutions that have specific hours, days off and/or caseloads assigned to each position must first allow internal canvassing by seniority according to Section 24.17 before posting the remaining vacancy for outside bid. Also, updated the section to comply with existing terminology as it applies to EEO. |
|
Attention: |
Agency Labor Relations and Personnel Officers. |
|
Effective Date: |
June 1, 2003 |
Job vacancies shall be awarded in the following sequential manner:
A. The job shall first be awarded to a bargaining unit applicant working at the facility where the vacancy exists in accordance with the above criteria.
B. If no selection is made from A above, the job shall be awarded to a bargaining unit applicant working in the agency where the vacancy exists in accordance with the above criteria.
C. If no selection is made from B above, the job shall be awarded to an applicant working in the bargaining unit in accordance with the above criteria.
D. If no selection is made from C above, the job may be awarded by hiring a new employee.
Within non-institutional agencies and within the Adult Parole Authority, step A above shall not apply.
This Agreement supersedes Ohio Civil Service Laws and Rules regarding eligibility lists for promotions.
Employees serving in a trial or probationary period shall not be permitted to bid on job vacancies.
An employee shall be permitted to bid on a job vacancy while receiving disability leave benefits, but shall not be eligible to fill the vacancy unless the employee is available to participate in the selection process and available to assume the position on the designated start date.
|
Explanation: |
The change clarifies that employees on disability must be able to participate in the selection process (e.g., structured interview, written test) as scheduled by te Employer as well as be released to return to work by the start date in order to be considered. |
|
Attention: |
Agency Labor Relations and Personnel Officers. |
|
Effective Date: |
June 1, 2003 |
|
Arbitration Awards: |
|
|
OCB #1248 |
Arbitrator Bowers; Grievant Bradley Kochunas; DR&C, 12/3/97. The Arbitrator denied the grievance after finding that the Grievant did not meet the minimum qualifications for the position. In addition, the Grievant failed to submit the proper support documentation during the selection process. |
| OCB #1311 |
Arbitrator Weisheit; Grievant Cathleen Veysey; Human Services, 7/28/98. This case set forth guidelines for determining when one employee is “significantly more qualified” than another. |
| OCB #1358 |
Arbitrator Brookins; Grievant Richard Ferguson; APA, 2/24/99. The Arbitrator held that the Union has the burden of proof by a preponderance of evidence that an agency’s decision to award a position to a junior employee is “unreasonable, arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.” |
| OCB #1371 |
Arbitrator Murphy; Grievant Sharon Woodgeard; DR&C, 4/99. The Arbitrator held that the Employer’s requirements for the position were “rationally related to the position description and duties” of the position. Accordingly, the Employer’s decision to award the position to a less senior employee was not a violation of the contract because the senior employee did not have the licensure that was required for the position. |
| OCB #1381 |
Arbitrator Goldberg; Grievant Stephen Norris; Human Services,
4/7/99. |
|
OCB #1592 |
Arbitrator Robert Brookins; Grievant Tim Mericle; DR&C, 07/14/02. Arbitrator Brookins confirmed that “significantly more qualified” is the correct standard to apply when promoting an employee with less seniority than other candidates. Additionally, the reasonable ratio to use is 2 points for every less year of experience, with one point equaling six months seniority. Any additional points discovered after the promotion decision are irrelevant. |