| |
HRD
> Policy Development > Topical
ADA Archive >
Topical
ADA Archive
Collective Bargaining
-
Aka
v. Washington Hosp. Center, (CA DC), 8 AD Cases 1093, 10/9/1998
Summary: It is impossible to determine from factual record whether
collective bargaining contract, which includes section on "handicapped
employees'' that specifically contemplates their reassignment
whenever "feasible,'' would ever preclude employer from
reassigning disabled employee to vacant position without complying
with contract's provisions regarding seniority and posting of
vacancies, but employer clearly has power to do so in at least
some circumstances.
-
Barnett
v. U.S. AIR Inc., (CA 9), 8 AD Cases 1073, 10/6/1998
ADA does not require employer to create exception within its
seniority system as accommodation to disabled employee, even
though seniority system was not product of collective bargaining.
Employees rely on this decades-old seniority system to award
equitably job assignments and shifts just as would employees
subject to collectively bargained seniority system. Employer's
seniority policy does not have exception that could encompass
disabled employees, and there is no suggestion that seniority
system is designed or used to discriminate against disabled
employees.
-
Wright
v. Universal Maritime Service Corp., (US. Sup Ct.), 8 AD
Cases 1429, 11/16/1998
Summary: A general arbitration clause in a collective-bargaining
agreement does not require an employee to use the arbitration
procedure to remedy an alleged violation of the ADA.
|
|
|